高级检索+
GITURU Wahiti Robert, 王青锋, 王勇, 郭友好. Cissus quadrangularis L.及其它小型肉质植物标本制作中的压制前处理[J]. 植物科学学报, 2001, 19(5): 421-427.
引用本文: GITURU Wahiti Robert, 王青锋, 王勇, 郭友好. Cissus quadrangularis L.及其它小型肉质植物标本制作中的压制前处理[J]. 植物科学学报, 2001, 19(5): 421-427.
GITURU Wahiti Robert, WANG Qing-Feng, WANG Yong, GUO You-Hao. Pre-Pressing Treatment for Cissus quadrangularis L. and Other Small Succulents[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2001, 19(5): 421-427.
Citation: GITURU Wahiti Robert, WANG Qing-Feng, WANG Yong, GUO You-Hao. Pre-Pressing Treatment for Cissus quadrangularis L. and Other Small Succulents[J]. Plant Science Journal, 2001, 19(5): 421-427.

Cissus quadrangularis L.及其它小型肉质植物标本制作中的压制前处理

Pre-Pressing Treatment for Cissus quadrangularis L. and Other Small Succulents

  • 摘要:Cissus quadrangularis L.为材料用不同的技术处理并比较其收缩程度、色彩保真程度以及茎附属物的保留情况。试验了3种常规预处理方法及2种针对肉质组织的处理方法,并进行ANOVA(Analysis of variance)分析,结果显示3种常规植物标本预处理方法明显不同(P<0.005),用LSD(least significant difference)分析方法分析得出深冷冻法对植物标本造成的损害比汽油法(LSD=1.708)和福尔马林法(LSD=2.065)要小;汽油法和福尔马林法处理后得到的标本质量无明显差别。用ANOVA法分析醋酸法、纵切法得到的标本及未经任何处理的标本,它们的效果也有明显不同(P<0.001),醋酸法得到的标本比纵切法(LSD=2.371)和未经任何处理得到的标本(LSD=2.138)效果更好,而纵切法和未经任何处理得到的标本并无明显不同(LSD=0.233NS)。醋酸处理法制作小型肉质植物标本其效果得到了植物标本馆工作者的肯定。

     

    Abstract: Herbarium specimens of Cissus quadrangularis L. were prepared by different techniques and compared for shrinkage, retention of color, and persi- stence of stem appendages. The efficacy of three pretreatment techniques and two methods of handling succulent tissue were investigated. Using analysis of variance (ANOVA) there was shown to be a significant difference (P<0.005) between the three pretreatment techniques. Using the least significant diffe- rence(LSD) test, the deep- freezing technique was shown to produce less distortion in the resultant specimens than the gasoline technique (LSD=1.708) and the formalin technique (LSD=2.065). No significant difference was observed in the quality of specimens produced by the formalin and the gasoline techniques (LSD=0.357NS). ANOVAtest indicated a significant difference in efficacy between the acetic acid treatment, the longitudinal sectioning treatment and untreated specimens (P<0.001). The acetic acid pretreatment was shown to be superior to the longitudinal sectioning pretreatment (LSD=2.371) and untreated specimens (LSD=2.138). No significant difference was found between the untreated specimens and those subjected to longitudinal sectioning (LSD=0.233NS). The acetic acid pretreatment technique is recommended for treating specimens of small succulents by herbarium workers.

     

/

返回文章
返回